책을 캠프에 두고 와서 아래 두 페이지를 참고로 요약/정리 했습니다.
http://www.marxists.org/korean/marx/communist-manifesto/index.htm
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/index.htm
읽을 때마다 새로운 문장을 발견하게 되는데, 이번에는 특히,
The theoretical conclusions of the Communists are in no way based on ideas or principles that have been invented, or discovered, by this or that would-be universal reformer. They merely express, in general terms, actual relations springing from an existing class struggle, from a historical movement going on under our very eyes.
Now and then the workers are victorious, but only for a time. The real fruit of their battles lies, not in the immediate result, but in the ever expanding union of the workers.
In bourgeois society, living labour is but a means to increase accumulated labour. In Communist society, accumulated labour is but a means to widen, to enrich, to promote the existence of the labourer. In bourgeois society, therefore, the past dominates the present; in Communist society, the present dominates the past. In bourgeois society capital is independent and has individuality, while the living person is dependent and has no individuality.
등의 구절이 마음에 드네요.
그럼, 내일 "our very eyes"로 이야기 해봅시다~
------
"부르주아적 생산관계와 교환 관계, 부 르주아적 소유 관계, 마치 마술이나 부린듯 그렇게도 강력한 생산 수단과 교환 수단을 만들 어 낸 현대 부르주아 사회는 자기가 주문으로 불러낸 저승 사자의 힘을 더 이상 감당할 수 없게 된 마술사와도 같다. (A similar movement is going on before our own eyes. Modern bourgeois society, with its relations of production, of exchange and of property, a society that has conjured up such gigantic means of production and of exchange, is like the sorcerer who is no longer able to control the powers of the nether world whom he has called up by his spells.)"
"공산주의의 특징은 소유 일반을 폐지하는 것이 아니라 부르주아적 소유를 폐지하는 것이다. ... 이런 의미에서 공산주의자들은 자신들의 이론을 사적 소유의 철폐라는 한마디 말로 요약할 수 있다. (The distinguishing feature of Communism is not the abolition of property generally, but the abolition of bourgeois property. ... In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.)"
"따라서 만약 자본이 공동체의 소유, 즉 사회 성원 전체 의 소유로 바뀐다고 하더라도 개인적 소유가 사회적 소유로 바뀌는 것은 아니다. 바뀌는 것은 오직 소유의 사회적 성격뿐이다. (When, therefore, capital is converted into common property, into the property of all members of society, personal property is not thereby transformed into social property. It is only the social character of the property that is changed. It loses its class character.)"